Total control
When developing its Boston Digital Arm upper limb prosthesis, Liberating Technologies identified the inflexibility of the control system as the primary limiting factor in upper limb prosthetic performance.
Until recently, upper limb prostheses were based on analog controls, meaning that a user relied solely on upper-arm muscle movements to control the prosthetic device.
If an amputee had limited use of the upper arm muscles, however, he or she may have been unable to use prosthesis or may only have been able to benefit from a fraction of its capabilities.
The power that the gripper exerted was controlled by a single predefined limit, meaning that the same amount of force used for lifting a heavy object would also be applied for holding an egg or a child’s hand. Also, traditional artificial limbs were limited to controlling only three joints one at a time – the elbow, wrist and hand.
When developing its Boston Digital Arm upper limb prosthesis, Liberating Technologies identified the inflexibility of the control system as the primary limiting factor in upper limb prosthetic performance.
“When we developed our system we considered both microcontrollers (MCUs) and digital signal controllers,” said Bill Hanson, president, Liberating Technology.
Register now to continue reading
Thanks for visiting The Engineer. You’ve now reached your monthly limit of news stories. Register for free to unlock unlimited access to all of our news coverage, as well as premium content including opinion, in-depth features and special reports.
Benefits of registering
-
In-depth insights and coverage of key emerging trends
-
Unrestricted access to special reports throughout the year
-
Daily technology news delivered straight to your inbox
Taking steps toward reindustrialisation
Hi Jack, The UK and EU caused their own electricity price problems - for Russia was happy to supply UK after the Ukraine invasion, provided they paid...