The Guardian’s ‘Keep it in the Ground’ Campaign received a highly equivocal response from the 621respondents to our poll. The largest single group, 33 per cent, said that ’eep it in the Ground’ was a good goal, but 50 per cent went for negative options, with 26 per cent saying the slogal was potentially harmful and 24 per cent saying that no organisation that would not exist without the financial contribution of petrochemical investments should feel that it ought to divest. Only 5 per cent gave the Guardian campaign an unconditional thumbs-up, and just 2 per cent thouiught that charitiesshould not invest in hydrocarbons.
Please continue to let us know what you think of this issue.
Invinity to build 20MWh flow battery in UK
Redux flow cells have had nowhere near the R+D effort compared to Lithium ion. They certainly have the potential (pun not intended) for longer...