- Companies should be responsible for encrypting all the financial information they hold, and should be legally liable for any loss of customer money in the event of a hack
- Companies should have compulsory cyber security contractors, who would be liable in the event of a hack
- Public-sector security advisors should be responsible for identifying threats and devising security measures for companies to install
- Defending against threats from nation-states should be the government’s job; defending against theft should be the company’s
- None of the above
Our poll responses slowed down somewhat last week, with 288 respondents. But the conclusion was clear; a definite majority, 60 per cent, thought that companies should bear legal reesponsibility for encrypting all the sensitive information they hold on their clients and customers. The next largest group, comprising a third of respondents, thought that the government should bear the responsibility for defending against cyber-threats from other nation-states, while companies should be responsible for defending against other criminal activity. There was very little support for the idea of public-sector secuity advisors bearing the responsibility for identifying threats and devising security measures, with only 1 per cent choosing this option; while 3 per cent agreed that companies should have compulsory cyber security contractors, who would then be liable for any losses incurred in the event of a hack. Another 3 per cent declined to pick an option.
Please conrintue to let us know your opinions on this subject.
Promoted content: Does social media work for engineers – and how can you make it work for you?
So in addition to doing their own job, engineers are expected to do the marketing department´s work for them as well? Sorry, wait a minute, I know the...