Engineers identify alternative catalyst for microbial fuel cells

Since more than 60 per cent of the investment in making microbial fuel cells is the cost of platinum, the discovery may lead to much more affordable energy conversion and storage devices.



According to a statement, the material — nitrogen-enriched iron-carbon nanorods — also has the potential to replace the platinum catalyst used in hydrogen-producing microbial electrolysis cells (MECs), which use organic matter to generate a possible alternative to fossil fuels.

‘Fuel cells are capable of directly converting fuel into electricity,’ said UWM Prof Junhong Chen, who created the nanorods and is testing them with Assistant Prof Zhen He. ‘With fuel cells, electrical power from renewable energy sources can be delivered where and when required, cleanly, efficiently and sustainably.’

The scientists also found that the nanorod catalyst outperformed a graphene-based alternative being developed elsewhere. The pair reportedly tested the material against two other contenders to replace platinum and found the nanorods’ performance consistently superior over a six-month period.



The nanorods have been proved stable and are scalable, said Chen, but more investigation is needed to determine how easily they can be mass-produced.

More study is also required to determine the exact interaction responsible for the nanorods’ performance.

Releasing electrons
MFCs generate electricity while removing organic contaminants from wastewater. On the anode electrode of an MFC, colonies of bacteria feed on organic matter, releasing electrons that create a current as they break down the waste.

On the cathode side, the most important reaction in MFCs is the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Platinum speeds this slow reaction, increasing efficiency of the cell, but it is expensive.

Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) are related to MFCs but instead of electricity, MECs produce hydrogen.

In addition to harnessing micro-organisms at the anode, MECS also use decomposition of organic matter and platinum in a catalytic process at their cathodes.



Chen and He’s nanorods are said to incorporate the best characteristics of other reactive materials, with nitrogen attached to the surface of the carbon rod and a core of iron carbide.

Nitrogen’s effectiveness at improving the carbon catalyst is already well known. Iron carbide, also known for its catalytic capabilities, interacts with the carbon on the rod surface, providing ‘communication’ with the core. Also, the material’s unique structure is optimal for electron transport, which is necessary for ORR.

When the nanorods were tested for potential use in MECs, the material did a better job than the graphene-based catalyst material, but it was still not as efficient as platinum.

‘But it shows that there could be more diverse applications for this material, compared to graphene,’ said He. ‘And it gave us clues for why the nanorods performed differently in MECs.’

Elements of the work have been published in the journal Nano Energy and Advanced Materials.